Running 32 bit on 64 bit linux
![running 32 bit on 64 bit linux running 32 bit on 64 bit linux](https://softfamous.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Pale-Moon-32-bit.jpg)
Thank you for your time and consideration. And there are many people out there who are poor and in tight positions financially.įor this reason especially, I request (for all distributions within the Ubuntu family) that this decision be delayed until enough 32 bit computers have been recycled/disposed of to where those that are left are in the extreme minority.
Running 32 bit on 64 bit linux free#
The fact that there are 32 bit distributions available, free of charge, for older systems helps keep perfectly usable computers in the hands of those who cannot afford (or easily afford) to purchase a new(er) computer. This is where Linux fills an important role.
Running 32 bit on 64 bit linux windows#
I’m inclined to think there are still bugs to iron out with respect to running 32 bit programs on 64 bit Linux operating systems.Īs part of my work as a computer repair technician, I’ve also installed a 32 bit versions of Linux for a couple clients with older systems where (installing) Windows was not an option, including for financial reasons.
![running 32 bit on 64 bit linux running 32 bit on 64 bit linux](https://i1.wp.com/www.debugpoint.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Blender-2.7.7-running-in-Ubuntu.png)
For myself personally, although my laptop is a 64 bit system, I’ve purposely chosen the 32 bit version of Lubuntu because I’ve found that a couple Linux games (that are available in the repositories) don’t crash with segmentation fault errors as they did when I was running Ubuntu 10.04 64 bit. I run Lubuntu 14.04 32 bit on both my laptop and desktop systems. That being said, how would we solve this? We would have to re-install every machine? You can’t “upgrade” to 64 bit can you? I think that this may not be so relevant any more. We made the decision to go with 32 bit since we didn’t know what we’d end up with. So it is actually 64 bit capable, since /proc/cpuinfo does include the “lm” flag. Most of the machines we have are HP dc7800 SFF (SKU#GC760AV), using an Intel Core 2 Duo T5470 (type 0, family 6, model 15, stepping 13). We actually have several machines that are of the same model and everything. I just wish there was a way to include info for multiple machines at a time. Of the last, let’s say 5, machines you got from the recycling how many were 64 bit capable? Then having RAM is useful to, because 64 bit on 1 GB is not fun. The only way I can confirm that myself is be seeing the processor. > One thing I have noticed is that there is a high rate of people thinking they have a 32-bit machine when they have on capable of 64 bit. I guess the possibility exists to do community supported releases like we do for ppc, no?įinally, do I really need to fill this out for every machine? There are 30-40 of them. Please don’t make those of us at the company that provide user support suffer that curse! our staff is largely not computer savvy). On the other hand one of our staff has been looking for the excuse to go FreeBSD as a desktop (note we are a manufacturer of a mechanical product i.e.
![running 32 bit on 64 bit linux running 32 bit on 64 bit linux](https://linux-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/Asterisk_1.jpg)
Still, I love Ubuntu and it’s community but don’t want to contribute to landfills by buying new stuff just to keep using it. Limited scope is necessary to achieve intended goals. That being said, reading Mark Shuttleworth’s wiki page recently helped me understand that Ubuntu is not the distro for every case. I admit we are a strange case, but why should we abandon our commitment to older machines when we officially support something committed to them (Lubuntu)? Our machines come from the local electronics recycling store. We have a mission that includes a commitment to being good environmental stewards. My workplace uses 32 bit machines almost exclusively, using Ubuntu Server and FreeBSD for servers and Kubuntu for desktop.